A review of methodological choice: Research paradigm underpins

dc.contributor.authorTharsika, K.
dc.contributor.authorPratheepkanth, P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T04:25:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T03:42:20Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02T04:25:50Z
dc.date.available2022-06-28T03:42:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on removing the ambiguity regarding selecting the research methodology when embarking on a research project by the researcher in the social science phenomenon. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods are the dominant methodologies in the social research milieu. Choosing an appropriate methodology is determined by the research paradigms (positivism, interpretive, transformative, and pragmatism). These paradigms are differentiated by the philosophical assumptions (ontology, epistemology, and research method). Therefore, the researcher should be aware of their philosophical assumptions because they inevitably shape the whole research project.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/5428
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Business Studies, Vavuniya Campus of the University of Jaffna, Sri Lankaen_US
dc.subjectPositivismen_US
dc.subjectInterpretiveen_US
dc.subjectInterpretiveen_US
dc.subjectTransformativeen_US
dc.subjectPragmatismen_US
dc.titleA review of methodological choice: Research paradigm underpinsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A review of methodological choice Research paradigm underpins.pdf
Size:
204.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections